Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

A Catholic Thinker

St. Thomas More’s “Horrible Moral Squint”

Last updated on: July 19, 2016 at 11:01 pm   by Tod Worner

St. Thomas More’s “Horrible Moral Squint” 2016-07-19T23:01:42-06:00 Tod Worner

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

oil-painting-74028_960_720

“Render unto Caesar what belongs to Caesar and to God what belongs to God.”

– Matthew 22:21

He was toying with him, the Cardinal was.

In Robert Bolt’s iconic play, A Man for All Seasons, it was late in the evening. Far away from the demands of London, Sir Thomas More was reclining in his comfortable Chelsea home when the summons came. Cardinal Wolsey, King Henry VIII’s Lord Chancellor, requested the presence of Sir Thomas at once on a matter of “the King’s business”. Grumbling would ensue among Thomas’ family and friends at the late hour and the questionable merits of the request, but the dutiful Sir Thomas only smiled. He gathered his effects, offered a family prayer to God (with special blessing for the King) and briskly boarded the waiting boat.

It was one o’clock in the morning when he finally found himself standing before Cardinal and Lord Chancellor Wolsey at Hampton Court. And the Cardinal offered meager eye contact. Despite the late hour, he made little of Thomas’ efforts to be responsive.

“It’s half past one. Where have you been?”

(A bell strikes one)

“One o’clock, your Grace. I’ve been on the river.”

And so the conversation would begin. While the Cardinal was aloof and petulant, Sir Thomas was engaged and earnest. The “King’s business” had seemingly brought them to an impasse. For this business was the delicate effort to achieve papal approval for the annulment of King Henry VIII’s marriage to Queen Catherine of Aragon. Once this was accomplished, the  King would be free to marry his mistress, Anne Boleyn, and bring forth an heir to the throne.

But this wasn’t proving to be easy.

After all, a special dispensation had been obtained (“for state reasons”) from the Pope for the King to marry his deceased brother’s widow, Catherine, but now, as Sir Thomas would so puckishly state,

“Now we are to ask the Pope to – dispense with his dispensation, also for state reasons?”

Sir Thomas More, respected judge, devout Catholic and honorable friend of the King had difficulty with the whole affair. Marriage is sacramental and, thus, indissoluble. The Church is the authority on matters moral and thus embraces even the headstrong King with its wise precepts. As such, man’s devious trifling with eternal verities courts wickedness and perdition. But the Cardinal saw it differently,

“You’re a constant regret to me, Thomas. If you could just see facts flat on, without that horrible moral squint; with just a little common sense, you could have been a statesman.”

Wow.

This line really caught me.

Because this is what the world says to us day after day after day.

“Be honest.” “Really think about it.” “Get real.”

Over and over again, we are told that – in myriad daily circumstances – our faith and morality only cloud our judgement instead of clarifying it. We need to be detached, we are told. We need to come down to earth, we are implored. We hear the constant explicit and implicit refrain: Truth is what you want it to be, not some uncompromising monitor. Conscience is fine and good as long as it doesn’t get in your way. To be wise and successful we are to not only be in the world, but of the world too. Or, once again, as the Cardinal said,

“If you could just see facts flat on, without that horrible moral squint; with just a little common sense, you could have been a statesman.”

It reminds me of one who once tempted another to forsake his “horrible moral squint”,

Then he took [Jesus] up and showed him all the kingdoms of the world in a single instant.
The devil said to him, “I shall give to you all this power and their glory; for it has been handed over to me, and I may give it to whomever I wish. All this will be yours, if you worship me.”

What was Sir Thomas More’s response to the Cardinal’s derisive jab?

“Well…I believe, when statesmen forsake their own private conscience for the sake of their public duties…they lead their country by a short route to chaos.”

But, surely – surely – Christ said it best,

“It is written:
‘You shall worship the Lord, your God,
and him alone shall you serve.’”

Yes. Yes.

Perhaps a moral squint isn’t so horrible after all.

————————————-
Photo credit: Pixabay

Uncategorized

a man for all seasons

moral squint

thomas more

Previous Post



July 7, 2016

Alton Sterling, Philando Castile & What Nuns Taught Me About This Messed Up World

Next Post



July 26, 2016 "Until My Last Breath" - The Tragedy & Hope of Father Jacques Hamel


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A Catholic Thinker's Story Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who danced with all his might before the LORD as the Ark was brought to Jerusalem?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Nathan Samuel Jonathan David

Related posts from A Catholic Thinker

Catholic

The Most Arrogant Coronation

A Catholic Thinker

Catholic

"Something Absolutely Modern" - The Insincere Convert from...

A Catholic Thinker

Catholic

Textualism vs. The Living Constitution: Justice Scalia, Judge...

A Catholic Thinker

Catholic

Memento Mori: Hope In a Year Heavy With...

A Catholic Thinker

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

It’s What Comes From Within Which Matters

One of the most difficult things for us to understand is why...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube