Patheos

BuddhistCatholicContemplativeEvangelicalGeneral ChristianHinduJewishLatter-day SaintMuslimNew VisionsProgressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Patheos

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

A Catholic Thinker

Conscience and Truth

Last updated on: December 28, 2014 at 4:16 pm   by Tod Worner

Conscience and Truth 2014-12-28T16:16:10-06:00 Tod Worner

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

“The truth does not change according to our ability to stomach it.”

– Flannery O’Connor

In this day and age, it seems that the fashionable and modern approach to morality involves invoking the word “Conscience” with a confident frequency and righteous vigor. “My Conscience guided me.”, “I listened to my Conscience.”, “My Conscience is intact.” Conscience is equated with that quiet voice inside that tells us that something is either right or wrong. We do well, we are told, when we heed its warning and poorly when we ignore it. Conscience, it is argued, is holy and unimpeachable. Conscience is Truth.

While this concept of Conscience is comforting, it is also convenient and, at times, perilous. One of the greatest threats of the modern age is the threat to Truth. First, the argument is made that while there may be a right to “admit a truth”, there is no right to believe that your truth is superior to mine. To believe this, it is rationalized, would be parochial at best and bigoted at worst. A second argument soon follows that if you have a truth and I have a truth with neither superior to the other, then perhaps this is no such thing as truth after all. If there is no truth whatsoever, then everything is relative – including and especially morality. Pope Benedict XVI (4/18/05) eloquently articulated the dangers inherent to this worldview:

“Today, having a clear faith based on the Creed of the Church is often labeled as fundamentalism. Whereas relativism, that is, letting oneself be ‘tossed here and there, carried about by every wind of doctrine’, seems the only attitude that can cope with modern times. We are building a dictatorship of relativism that does not recognize anything as definitive and whose ultimate goal consists solely of one’s own ego and desires.”

Read that last sentence carefully one more time:

“We are building a dictatorship of relativism that does not recognize anything as definitive and whose ultimate goal consists solely of one’s own ego and desires.”

And so we enter the modern idolatry of and manipulation of the word “Conscience”. The current notion of Conscience serves two purposes: 1) It vaguely spiritualizes the “small voice within each of us”, thus rendering the modern Conscience sacred and holy, and 2) It conforms to the stylish precepts of moral relativism where your Conscience is yours and yours alone – unimpeachable, inerrant, and self-satisfied. Conscience, in effect, is free-floating, without reference point, and ultimately deliciously serves “one’s own ego and desires.”

Now, lest I be misunderstood, I have no doubts about the existence and value of Conscience – just not this modern conception of it. Pope John Paul II wrote a brilliant encyclical, Veritatis Splendor (The Splendor of the Truth), where he grapples with the notion of Conscience. As he wisely articulates (and as I roughly paraphrase), there is an Absolute Truth which is the Word and Will of God. This has been revealed to us through the Biblical Law, the writings of the Prophets, the teachings and example of Christ (God Incarnate), and the indelible mark of the Holy Spirit within each of us (the Law written on our hearts). It is possible for us to apprehend God’s Truth through study, prayer, and receptivity to the Holy Spirit. Conscience, by Pope John Paul II’s definition, is the tool within us that assists in bringing us as close as possible to God’s Truth. This reasons (and quite stark when juxtaposed against the modern definition) that 1) Conscience is a means to bring us to an Absolute Truth (and is not holy in and of itself), and 2) Conscience as a means or tool needs to be shaped or molded to recognize what the Truth is, otherwise it is stunted, deformed, and fails in its fundamental responsibility as trustworthy guide to the Truth. In Pope John Paul II’s words:

“When God’s truth is obscured, human consciences are also deformed, if sin is denied, God is also denied…Human conscience goes astray if it is neglected and deprived of the truth…Conscience has an inalienable right to the truth and it is most intimately related to human dignity…Therefore human dignity requires that a person orient his conscience in accordance with the lawful order established by the Creator.”

This struck me as brilliant. Conscience is a means to an end (the Absolute, Objective Truth of God), not an end in itself. Conscience ill-formed and poorly cultivated in the Truths of God can be deformed and lead us astray. Without the true formation of Conscience to recognize God’s Truth as the infallible reference point upon which our actions are judged right or wrong, Conscience becomes rudderless. And when Conscience becomes rudderless, everything is relative. Yet relativity is a vacuum that ultimately must be filled with something. That something is our own selfish ego and desires. The very Conscience that was designed to lead to  God has led you away from Him. A deformed Conscience will ultimately abdicate its role of leading to God’s Truth and will, in fact, follow fashion and appetite. And we convince ourselves that if we simply heed our Conscience, all will be well.

If one were to think this is a complex, pedantic theological exercise of little true relevance, you would be amazed at how many bright minds have grappled with our propensity to follow a deformed Conscience away from God when His Truth is standing in front of our very eyes. The tempting of man away from God and towards self-satisfaction is not new. In fact, it is the oldest trick in the Devil’s playbook. Truth matters. And we need a reliable Conscience to guide and correct us when we are in error. As several bright minds have reflected:

“If you believe what you like in the gospels, and reject what you don’t like, it is not the gospel you believe, but yourself.”

– Saint Augustine

“There was truth and there was untruth, and if you clung to the truth even against the whole world, you were not mad.”

– George Orwell

“Right is right, even if no one is right. Wrong is wrong, even if everyone is wrong. “

– Archbishop Fulton J. Sheen

“To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it.” 

– G.K. Chesterton

“The truth is incontrovertible. Malice may attack it, ignorance may deride it, but in the end, there it is.”

– Winston Churchill

God’s Truth stands alone. It endures. It is incontrovertible. And in spite of attacks, “there it is.” Conscience is not Truth. Rather, it is a tool. And if this tool is well-formed and well-heeded, it can bring us to Truth. It can bring us to the loving brilliance of God. Indeed. And what a wonderful place for us to be.

Uncategorized

Previous Post



April 23, 2013

Traitors

Next Post



May 2, 2013 Catholic Optimism


Browse Our Archives

Select a Category A Catholic Thinker's Story Uncategorized

Select a Month March 2017 February 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 July 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012


Follow Us!

Follow Us on Twitter



TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Why was crossing the Jordan River particularly difficult for the Israelites at that time?

Select your answer to see how you score.

There were no bridges It was at flood stage The river was filled with crocodiles The river was frozen

Related posts from A Catholic Thinker

Catholic

"Something Absolutely Modern" - The Insincere Convert from...

A Catholic Thinker

Catholic

Textualism vs. The Living Constitution: Justice Scalia, Judge...

A Catholic Thinker

Catholic

Memento Mori: Hope In a Year Heavy With...

A Catholic Thinker

Catholic

Advent: The Greatest Resistance Story of All Time

A Catholic Thinker

TRENDING AT PATHEOS Catholic

The Parable Of The Sower And The Word...

One of Christ’s most famous parables is that of the sower who...

Rejecting Doom: Christian Hope And Human Action

Christianity is a religion of hope. We are to have hope and...

Why I Choose the Eucharist Over the Sermon

Choose the Eucharist, Not the Sermon What are we supposed to get...

5 Design Elements Found in Spiritually Rooted Homes

Putting Spirituality Into Home Decor Our homes are more than our living...

Credo: A Story of God Told with the...

About 10 years ago, I began to imagine a personal "Credo" that...

The Anatomy of Divine Revelation in Catholic Thought

The claim that God has made Himself known to human beings is...

view all Catholic blogs

Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Copyright 2008-2026, Patheos. All rights reserved.

Subscription Support Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In

Follow Patheos Patheos on Facebook Patheos on YouTube