Buddhist Catholic Contemplative Evangelical General Christian Hindu Jewish Latter-day Saint Muslim New Visions Progressive Christian

Beliefs

Topics

Columnists

Resource Library

Research Tools

Video

Podcasts

Thought Readers

Faith In Media Tracker

Newsletters

Ad-Free & Subscriber Log-In Subscription Support

Follow Patheos

Above and Beyond the 5 Senses

Home
About

Home
New Visions
Above and Beyond The Dark Origins of Political Correctness (Part 2)

Above and Beyond The Dark Origins of Political Correctness (Part 2)

Last updated on: March 12, 2018 at 8:13 am by kathleenokeefe

Above and Beyond The Dark Origins of Political Correctness (Part 2) 2018-02-27T14:51:06-07:00 kathleenokeefe

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

My guest blogger this month is multi-award winning Novelist Peter Canova, author of the First Souls Trilogy which includes his much-talked-about first book, Pope Annalisa. Today, he shares his insights with you on the dark origins of the latest trend in social behavior sweeping our nation- Political Correctness. As you will read in this article Political Correctness, aka, PC is not new to the United States or even the world. In fact it has been around for a very long time and has some very dark roots.

In the first part of this article, I described an incident of political correctness where a public figure unnecessarily criticized and embarrassed a lady for her use of a customary, non-offensive term that did not fit into his vision of politically correct lexicon. I can understand the reaction for, “so what, what’s the big deal?” Here in part 2, I clarify why it’s a big deal.

Political Correctness (PC)– today people:

a.) buy into it

b.) resent it, or

c.) brush it off as harmless drivel.

Political Correctness is not harmless.

Understanding its history, why it came into existence, and how it was used indicates the potentially pathogenic course of what is tantamount to a psychic virus.

This may sound a bit dramatic, but once you become aware of PC’s origin, history and usage, you may change your perspective. Contrary to the simplistic notion that PC is synonymous with politeness, sensitivity, and treating others with respect, it is a tried and true ideology of suppression, not of liberation. It was developed as a tool of societal control to eliminate free debate and rational discourse. Though it has been used in several repressive societies, it was brought to an art form in Red China.

“The Great Leap Forward”

During the communist revolution in China, Mao Zedong adopted two tools to succeed in gaining complete control over the country—unremitting violence and “correct thought.”

This was the beginning of modern political correctness.

In the early 1950’s just after consolidating power, Mao embarked on the Great Leap Forward, an attempt at rapid industrialization of the country. He would trade grain to communist Russia in return for setting up factories. The amount of grain he needed to be produced was enormous. He forced the Chinese peasantry into slave labor setting impossible production goals. If not met, he withheld food from them while most of the grain went off to Russia. It’s estimated that 14-20 million peasants died of starvation.

The damage to the country was so great, that members of his own party took the bold step of criticizing his rule. Mao was a sadistic dictator who did Hitler and Stalin proud. In order to eliminate his opposition within and outside of the Communist party, he needed to build an army that was in ideological lockstep with his goals. Enter “correct thinking” (his term) the ideological forerunner of PC. Mao’s correct thinking was my way or the highway, and the highway in this case was a one-way terminal trip. Ideology can be adopted intellectually or by force and the voluntary part wasn’t working so well. Mao needed a tool to enforce his new ideology so he did two clever things.

First, he codified correct thinking into the infamous Little Red Book, making his philosophy more tangible. His next step was nefariously brilliant. Taking a page from Hitler, he formed his own corps of stormtroopers to enforce his will and terrorize the population. He astutely recognized that young minds are the most impressionable and subject to indoctrination, so he recruited students into his army of terror. They swept across the country in what became known as the Cultural Revolution. The young students went on a decade-long rampage reciting verses from the Red Book and combating the “four olds”—Old Customs, Old Culture, Old Habits, and Old Ideas—which meant any traditional values that disagreed with Mao’s “progressive” direction. Getting to sound a bit familiar? The students murdered and brutalized their teachers, the older generation, and any that would not conform to Mao’s vision of a brainwashed culture.

How PC Migrated to America

The violence in China reached a crescendo in the 1960’s and 70’s. This event coincided with the Vietnam War and the huge anti-war movement in America that produce the first mass-radicalization on college campuses. The radical leftist elements that emerged in America during the war naturally sought models to guide their efforts in executing their agenda. I remember that time as a student. Large contingents of student radicals participated in the huge anti-war marches shaking Mao’s red book in their raised fists, eerily mimicking the millions of zombie-like Chinese students terrorizing their own countryside.

This radical movement proceeded to enforce its goals with occupations of college facilities, disruptions of classes, shouting down the opposition, and attempting to enshrine their views as sacrosanct ideas the correctness of which no one should dare to dispute. Thus appeared on American campuses and within the fabric of leftist politics the seeds of PC.

Fast forward to the present. The radical violence of the sixties abated, but the notion of eliminating free debate by establishing a sacred standard of thinking, language, behavior, and political views incubated and morphed into modern political correctness. Campuses today are still a spawning ground for indoctrination and a bastion of political correctness. The political leanings of college faculties, many of whom are products of the 60’s, is well known. You do not find many traditional voices there or in the American educational system in general. Lack of diverse ideas is becoming the death knell of traditional liberal education as much as it has caused the demise of an objective, non-partisan press.

Still, we have to be careful in drawing direct comparisons of the American experience to that of the Chinese. We have not reached that level of outright violence and repression, not yet. But, witness the recent suppression of opposing conservative voices on campuses through rioting and property destruction. At Evergreen College, the old 60’s tactics of occupying offices were employed along with intimidation of people opposing an “absence of white people” day on campus. You were a racist if you did not agree with whites absenting themselves from the college they pay to attend. How’s that for double-think?

A Budding Climate of Intolerance

Recently we saw the politically motivated shooting of GOP congressmen in the wake of anti-Trump hysteria on the part of the media, the entertainment industry, and the campuses where students sought safe rooms with cookies and Playdoh to soften the shock of Trump’s election. Hillary Clinton described Trump supporters as a “basket of deplorable,” racist, sexist, homophobic and all the other clichés that dismiss the essence of your opponents in a single easy label –fits- all words. This shooting incident was also preceded by a comedienne holding up a severed Trump-head likeness and a public play in which Julius Caesar Trump is stabbed to death on stage by minority actors.

Am I laying this climate of hatred and budding violence at the doorstep of Politically Correct? There certainly is a nexus.

Political Correctness has transformed large segments of our society into uncritical dogmatists trying to silence diverse opinions. They are inculcated into thinking their way is the only right course for the human race. This entitled mindset is the only explanation for the depth of shock displayed in the anti-Trump phenomenon. Losers exist in every election, but this electoral loss by the left was like a mass psychosis, a hyper-indignant disbelief that the country could elect someone so alien to their way of talking, thinking, and acting.

In the brave new world of PC, if you disagree with the standard line on climate change, you’re a lunatic, and some have advocated jail terms for people holding opposing opinions. You must be aware of an ever-changing landscape of words you can use so as not to engender hurt feelings on someone else’s part. BTW, they get to define when and how their feelings are hurt. If you oppose economy-killing hyper government regulations that hurt the middle classes, you’re anti-worker. Multi-culturalism, a good and inevitable concept, has unfortunately been promoted with charges racism and white privilege, which is divisive, not multi-cultural.

Disagreements with the direction of the Obama administration qualified many as being racist. CNN happily trots out Van Jones to tell people that Trump’s election had nothing to do with the policies of the prior administration. Those policies demonized producers in the country as greedy “one percenters,” let Isis run rampant, and lost our nation’s credit rating by piling up record debt. Nope, there were no reasons to criticize the Obama White House. Instead, it was “whitelash” against a black president, which makes half the country de facto racists. But hey, that’s PC. I believe there was a backlash, however. It was a reaction by people fed up with Hollywood, the media, and politicians like Clinton telling them what to do, how to think, how to talk, and then calling them derogatory names for non-compliance.

The “PC” ideological virus is dangerous and needs to be called out because it is insidious.

Like other politically motivated infections of its kind, it operates under the banner of fairness, inclusion, diversity, and equality. So did Stalinist Russia, Maoist China, and the Khmer Rouge. How’d that work for the people? Any unbiased observer can tell you that the PC police are the least tolerant, least inclusive, least fair, and least diverse group of dogmatists going. This should be a tip-off that, like so many other devious socio-political philosophies, PC is not sincere in its stated goals. It is merely a tool to gain power for people who historically have replaced what they oppose with something worse.

The ultimate course of thought control movements is to graduate to violence. Thought control acts as the conditioner to dehumanize one’s opposition. Once that is achieved, opponents become open targets. Modern American PC is still contained so far as a dominating ideological force. But, even if arrested at this stage, it has a chilling Big Brother effect of mind control already becoming normative for our future leaders on college campuses. Their uncontested, self-righteous worldviews are encouraged by their professors, the media, politicians, and the entertainment industry. We are raising a crop of non-critical, brainwashed lemmings in our educational system.

There is an American-Way and It’s Not “PC”

Of course, many people who agree with political correctness are not Maoist radicals, but ideas and language are the precursors of reality. By seeking to control the language and make their ideas the standard, the people who drive PC are injecting an inherently totalitarian strain into the body politic. Respect but debate has been the American way, and change has primarily been prosecuted through issues that uplift the nation, not fragmented interest groups within the nation. This has been the best formula for diversity to work.

We can still empower one segment of people without criminalizing another segment, but only if we do not allow Political Correctness to progress to the extremes toward which it is heading.

We must allow traditional debate free of intimidation to proceed without dehumanizing opponents under a barrage of dismissive labels.

Thank you, Peter Canova, for sharing your insights with us concerning political correctness and religious charitable organizations in the arena of world events.

As the reader of this blog/article, if you have any insights, suggestions, or responses you would like to share with the readership or Mr. Canova, please do so in the comments section below. We’d love to hear from you.

About the Guest Author: Peter Canova is a multi-award winning author, speaker, and inspirational visionary. His book, Pope Annalisa has won ten national and inter

national book awards. The theme underlying Peter’s body of work is that all people have the ability to transcend their ordinary consciousness and experience information from a higher source within themselves. Learn more @ https:/

/www.amazon.com/Peter-Canova/e/B00GC4J54U

About the Author: Kathleen (Kat) O’Keefe-Kanavos is a TV Producer/Host and Author/Lecturer of Dreams That Can Save Your Life written with Drs Larry Burk & Berne Siegel which promotes patient advocacy and connecting with Dreams for success in health, wealth, and relationships. Kathleen O’Keefe-Kanavos Website– Personal Facebook– Surviving Cancerland Facebook–Dreams That Can Save Your Life Facebook– Google+ – LinkedIn – Pinterest – Twitter – Youtube– Book

Photo credit: httpspixabay.comenconditionality-insecurity-fear-889217-johnhain-CCO-Public-No-Attribution-Required.png

book-1659717_960_720-Gellinger-Pixabay-Free-CC0-Public-Domain-No-Attribution-Required.jpg

httpspixabay.comensecurity-insecurity-vulnerability-856168 johnhain CCO Public No Attribution Required.PNG

keijj44-pixabay.com-football-team-1529533_1280-CCO-Public-Domain-ree-Commercial-Use-No-Attribution-Required.jpg

religious-stained-glass-window_XkGDEN-e1447027418713.jpg

Bio pictures were used with permission of the authors

Uncategorized

Above and Beyond The Dark Origins of Political Correctness (Part 2)

Dream Expert Kathleen O'Keefe-Kanavos

Novelist Peter Canova

Political Correctness

Pope Annalisa

relationships

Spirituality

Previous Post

March 11, 2018

Chinese New Year 2018: Who Let the Dogs Out? (Part 5)

Next Post

March 21, 2018 Above and Beyond Your Dreams: Early Warning Tools for Disease

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category Dreams Uncategorized

Select a Month August 2023 November 2022 September 2022 August 2022 February 2022 October 2021 September 2021 August 2021 July 2021 January 2021 November 2020 October 2020 September 2020 July 2020 June 2020 May 2020 March 2020 February 2020 January 2020 November 2019 October 2019 August 2019 July 2019 June 2019 May 2019 April 2019 March 2019 February 2019 January 2019 December 2018 November 2018 October 2018 September 2018 August 2018 July 2018 June 2018 May 2018 March 2018 February 2018 January 2018 November 2017 October 2017 July 2017 June 2017 May 2017 April 2017 March 2017 February 2017 January 2017 December 2016 November 2016 October 2016 September 2016 August 2016 June 2016 May 2016 April 2016 March 2016 February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 January 2012

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz