TIFF 2014: The Clouds of Sils Maria

Last updated on: April 12, 2015 at 8:53 pm by Kenneth R. Morefield

TIFF 2014: The Clouds of Sils Maria 2015-04-12T20:53:33-05:00 Kenneth R. Morefield

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Clouds of Sils Maria, the new film by Olivier Assayas, is a carefully observed, rich and subtle melodrama of the sort that fans of the director’s previous works should enjoy immensely. It features the incomparable Juliet Binoche in the lead role of Maria Enders, and it includes terrific supporting performances from Kristen Stewart as Valentine and Chloë Grace Moretz (in one of her four films playing at TIFF 2014) as Jo-Ann Ellis. Assayas has provided his three actresses with a script that really allows them to showcase their acting chops — Stewart in particular is a minor revelation. Because the character portraits are more precise than they might be in the average film, Clouds would seemingly reward careful, even repeat, viewing.

That’s a quality I esteem pretty highly, in a film coming from people whose work I generally esteem. If you sense that’s a preface to my beginning to backpedal, I can only reaffirm that I have nothing particularly negative to say about the film. It left me a little cold, never quite engaging me emotionally, even while I was admiring its virtuosity.

Maria is an aging actress whose breakthrough role came in a Bergmanesque drama about the relationship between an older woman and her younger…protege? assistant? lover?. As the film opens Maria is heading off to receive an award for her reclusive mentor, a writer who refuses to go to the ceremony himself. Soon after, she is offered a a chance to star in a revival of the drama that made her famous, this time in the role of the older woman. The role that made her famous will be filled by a Hollywood ingenue (Moretz) who has recently starred in an X-Menesque sci-fi flick and who has plenty of viral videos on the Internet in which she badmouths just about everyone. One of the welcome bits of levity in the film comes when Maria and Valentine sneak off to watch (and later discuss) the Hollywood film.

The meditations on stardom are one of the many many ways the film works. Maria dismisses Jo-Ann’s work as less artistic and important than her own, but Valentine pushes back on her, drawing parallels between Jo-Ann’s work and that of Maria’s earlier days. When the two prospective stars finally meet, the scene is filled with delicious irony. Jo-Ann praises her elder colleague profusely, claiming to have been inspired to act by one of Maria’s previous films but unable to recall its title. (“…the movie you did with Harrison Ford….”) Is Jo-Ann deliberately tweaking her new co-worker or is she sincere in her claims of being starstruck herself? Maria feigns disinterest in the baser, paparazzi driven side of the industry, but when she is alone she checks out Jo-Ann’s videos and smiles appreciatively when she tells a reporter catching her in a “gotcha” moment to “do your job, you’re a fucking reporter.”

I thought the film was the better for not making Jo-Ann’s character too nasty nor Maria’s character entirely sympathetic. For all the insinuations that younger starlets are more pampered and superficial, it’s hard to miss the implications of Valentine asking, “You want me to finish it for you?” when Maria struggles to write out a testimonial to the man to whom she says she “owes everything.”

What didn’t entirely work for me were the central scenes in which Valentine goes to a retreat with Maria to run lines. Because we don’t know the imaginary play, we come to realize that (by design) it is hard to distinguish between when Valentine and Maria are speaking to each other and when they are in character. It’s easy enough to admire the cleverness of the writing and acting here, and I did. But admiring the architecture of a scene and being moved by it to reflect on deeper themes are two different things. One could, I suppose, reflect on the fact that we often conflate our stars with their characters and that in a twenty-four hour infotainment cycle we hardly know when someone is performing as opposed to just being herself.

That’s not a profound or new revelation though. A more subtly made point might be made about how the roles we choose to play (or are chosen for) actually shape who we become in more deterministic ways than we normally concede. It’s Kurt Vonnegut’s old rube about being careful who (or what) we pretend to be, since in the end we become what we pretend to be. That’s a theme I could get behind, but it would have been more powerful in the film if we actually got more of the play–if the theme were illustrated rather than just asserted after the fact. We get a few references to what Maria used to be like, and she speaks pretty openly about why taking on this new role scares her. But given that we sometimes don’t know when she is performing and when she is not, the film’s hall may have one too many mirrors in it. It’s hard to lament the loss of Maria’s core self/true identity if we aren’t sure we ever saw it in the first place.

Those quibbles aside, The Clouds of Sils Maria (★★★½) consistently entertains and engages.

Toronto International Film Festival

Previous Post

September 4, 2014

Blake Rayne Interview: Identical Star Discusses Learning from a Pro

Next Post

September 6, 2014 Video: TIFF 2014 Reviews -- Gemma Bovery

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 10 Years Later 1999 Top 5 2007 Top 10 2008 Favorite Discoveries 2008 Top 10 2009 Favorite Discoveries 2009 Top 10 2010 Favorite Discoveries 2010 Top 10 2011 Top 10 2012 Top Ten 2013 Top Ten 2014 Top Ten Best Picture Winners Christian Spotlight on Entertainment Christianity Today Coming Soon Disclosure Disclosure--AS Disclosure--Book Disclosure--DVDS Disclosure--SEOL Disclosure--Travel Dissenting Opinion Elsewhere Emergenetics Essays Featured Film Fest DC--2014 Film Festivals Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2010 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2011 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2012 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2013 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2014 Headline Interviews Laura on the Oscar Winners Podcasts Quick Impressions Reviews RiverRun Film Festival 2014 Television The Criterion Collection The Thin Place To Stream or Not to Stream? Top 10s and Other Lists Toronto International Film Festival 2009 Toronto International Film Festival 2010 Toronto International Film Festival 2011 Toronto International Film Festival 2012 Toronto International Film Festival 2013 Toronto International Film Festival 2014 Uncategorized Video Virginia Film Festival 2011 Virginia Film Festival 2013 Women's Film Festival 2012

Select a Month February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who is known for teaching that "faith without works is dead"?

Select your answer to see how you score.

James Paul Jude Peter