The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn — Part I (Condon, 2011)

Last updated on: February 27, 2015 at 10:51 pm by Kenneth R. Morefield

The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn — Part I (Condon, 2011) 2015-02-27T22:51:56-05:00 Kenneth R. Morefield

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

My review of the latest Twilight film originally appeared at Christianity Today Movies & TV.

When last we left the Twilight franchise, vampire Edward Cullen had reluctantly agreed to turn his human beloved, Bella Swan into an immortal yet soulless creature like himself—under the condition that she would agree to marry him. Breaking Dawn—Part I opens with romantic rival (and werewolf) Jacob Black receiving his wedding invitation. The plot of the film centers on the wedding and honeymoon of the main couple and how complications arising from them threaten to end a fragile peace treaty between the vampires and werewolves.

While I do not count myself amongst the franchise’s devotees—I have read the first book and seen all the films, mostly out of anthropological curiosity—I have come to wonder whether some its most hostile critics might be engaged in what Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick calls “paranoid readings.” The characteristic mood of a paranoid reading is contempt toward or fear of the object being scrutinized (as opposed to curiosity about it), and, perhaps, the characteristic critical action is to view the art object as wholly bad, representative of a class, movement, position, or ideology that is both threatening and repugnant to the viewer. Paranoid readings deny any complexity in the art object, and they tend to treat the objects of analysis as static, unchanging. Paranoid readings, too, have a scapegoating tendency, often treating the art object as representative of (or even the source of) all that stands in absolute contrast to the reader’s own ideological purity.

A paranoid reading of the love narrative in Twilight, for example, might characterize Edward as a patriarchal control freak, focusing on those incidents where he seeks to control Bella’s behavior and excluding those areas where Bella actually is empowered to make her own choices—such as retaining and developing a relationship with Jacob or deciding how to handle a life-threatening pregnancy. Alternately, it may characterize Bella as a passive heroine in contrast to female action heroes (Buffy Summers, Sarah Connor, Ellen Ripley), a later day Helen of Troy who is the sought after prize in a conflict that is primarily amongst men. Such readings may neglect Bella’s role in saving Edward from the Volturi or her intent to sacrifice herself at the end of Twilight (she does not simply find herself in a position where she needs to be rescued; she places herself in a position of sacrifice as an autonomous choice). The point of such counter-analyses is not that all criticisms of the series are wrong but that singularly extreme ones tend to say as much about the state of the critic as they do about the art object.

That said, it is increasingly difficult to take the franchise seriously as anything more/other than a teen soap opera. Breaking Dawn, Part I arrives at a point in a series where the story should be gathering momentum but instead it lags, with most of the second half of the film consisting of characters sitting around talking about what they are going to do once the climactic moment arrives. The conflicts in a series should develop, deepen, and acquire greater power, but instead they are mostly just endlessly repeated. This franchise operates structurally more like a serial such as James Bond, with essentially the same plot being reenacted with slight variations, than like a series in which individual installments are supposed to both stand alone and advance the larger metanarrive. Jacob despises Edward for endangering Bella and agreeing to take her humanity from her but cannot help but align himself with the Cullen clan when she is endangered. Haven’t we seen that plot before?

From a strictly cinematic perspective, the biggest change here is that Bill Condon takes over directorial duties from David Slade. Condon’s confidence injects some much needed stability—the camera work and editing in Eclipse seemed downright restless—and he manages to expand the film’s color palette through the wedding scenes and most of the honeymoon. Even he seems stumped, however, in how to make the climactic battle scene visually interesting, and a scene in which the wolves argue in human voices extracted more than a few giggles from an otherwise enthusiastic first night audience. Even more problematic is Melissa Rosenberg’s script, which relies on progressively more expository dialogue to tell us what is happening and soundtrack music to tell us how we should feel about it. We are four films into a five-film set, and yet we are still having characters explain to each other what they are doing—such as a key moment in which Edward informs us verbally of what Jacob just did and why it will end the werewolf-vampire conflict. Perhaps in the first film such lines might be useful at bringing the uninitiated up to speed. Here all they serve to do is provide the (admittedly false) feeling that plot points are being made up off the cuff so that the script can cheat its way out of what was initially presented as an unavoidable dilemma.

On the positive side, Kristen Stewart (as Bella) and Taylor Lautner (Jacob) manage to show some range, and they do have genuine chemistry in their scenes together. Robert Pattinson (Edward) is pretty, though he mostly lacks the physical presence to convey actual menace when he delivers lines about protecting his family.

The local multiplex where I viewed the film ran screenings at 12:01, 12:02, 12:03, 12:04, 12:05, 12:06, 12:07, and 12:08, and it sold out all eight of them. I’m not paranoid enough to tell you that is a sign that the end is near, but I feel confident in saying 99.9 percent of the viewers who will think this is better than a 1½-star film will have already seen it by the time this review had been posted several hours later on Friday morning. If you aren’t one of them, this won’t be the film that makes you a convert.

Elsewhere

Reviews

Bill Condon

Breaking Dawn -- Part I

The Twilight Saga

Previous Post

November 20, 2011

Alps (Lanthimos, 2011)

Next Post

November 29, 2011 I Confess (Hitchcock, 1953)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 10 Years Later 1999 Top 5 2007 Top 10 2008 Favorite Discoveries 2008 Top 10 2009 Favorite Discoveries 2009 Top 10 2010 Favorite Discoveries 2010 Top 10 2011 Top 10 2012 Top Ten 2013 Top Ten 2014 Top Ten Best Picture Winners Christian Spotlight on Entertainment Christianity Today Coming Soon Disclosure Disclosure--AS Disclosure--Book Disclosure--DVDS Disclosure--SEOL Disclosure--Travel Dissenting Opinion Elsewhere Emergenetics Essays Featured Film Fest DC--2014 Film Festivals Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2010 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2011 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2012 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2013 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2014 Headline Interviews Laura on the Oscar Winners Podcasts Quick Impressions Reviews RiverRun Film Festival 2014 Television The Criterion Collection The Thin Place To Stream or Not to Stream? Top 10s and Other Lists Toronto International Film Festival 2009 Toronto International Film Festival 2010 Toronto International Film Festival 2011 Toronto International Film Festival 2012 Toronto International Film Festival 2013 Toronto International Film Festival 2014 Uncategorized Video Virginia Film Festival 2011 Virginia Film Festival 2013 Women's Film Festival 2012

Select a Month February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did the Israelites have to gather twice as much of before Sabbath?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Quail Fish Barley Manna