The Railway Man (Teplitzky, 2013)

Last updated on: July 26, 2014 at 8:41 pm by Kenneth R. Morefield

The Railway Man (Teplitzky, 2013) 2014-07-26T20:41:29-05:00 Kenneth R. Morefield

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Does depicting torture automatically earn a movie three stars or more if it is inspired by a true story?

I am not trying to be cheeky. Heaven knows I am not. I’ve known people who have been tortured. I imagine I have looked at them with many of the same feelings that Jonathan Teplitzky and screenwriters Frank Cottrell Boyce and Andy Paterson have for Eric Lomax (Colin Firth): respect, admiration, even a hint of awe.

Those are all the feelings, not coincidentally, that so many of my students used to have for their grandparents (most of them dead) that they wanted to write about the first several years I taught Freshman Composition. I always tried to steer them away to safer topics. Very few of us have the emotional capacity to distinguish between someone giving low marks to our personal heroes and someone giving low marks to our representations of them.

Lomax is a railway enthusiast who meets–I’d say “meets cute” if the film weren’t so somber it made all such references to film conventions appear offensive–his wife to be on a train he hops onto at just the last moment. (Nicole Kidman has her smallest role in years.) Pretty soon they are married and pretty soon plus one scene later he is curling on the floor and screaming in night terrors. She can’t get him to open up about his nightmares, but chances are pretty good they have something to do with the time he spent as a prisoner of war.

Eric finds out the Japanese translator who tortured him is still alive, and he travels back to the camp (now a war museum) to confront him. What happened there was so special one can hardly believe a movie could mess it up even if it were trying. I can’t believe The Railway Man is trying, but it seems like every directorial and editing decision is designed to draw our attention away from what makes the story special–and here I offer implied spoiler warnings–and towards that which makes it generic.

The film’s biggest mistake is, I think a reoccurring flashback structure that splices Eric’s prisoner-of-war experience in between his return to the camp. That is meant, I suppose, to raise the emotional stakes (as if they needed raising) of the confrontation between Eric and Nagase and keep us in suspense about whether or not Eric will extract retribution. The problem with such a structure, aside from the fact that it makes the film seem oblivious to where the story’s actual drama lies, is that once Eric makes his decision, we are asked to process in five minutes what he struggled with for many years. We understand intellectually that he has had years to process this experience, but for us it has just happened, and so his response to it is both underdeveloped and under-explored.

Eric says that his wife, Patti, has made the difference between him and those who chose to try to deal with their war experiences in other ways. That’s believable in a biographical sense, but I challenge anyone to point to a single scene or exchange between Eric and Patti in the first one hundred minutes of the movie that would make the audience understand that fact if Eric didn’t tell us it was so.

Colin Firth has made a career out of playing men uncomfortable in their own skin. He brings a vulnerability that is at odds with his imposing size, and in works such as Fever Pitch, Pride & Prejudice, The King’s Speech, and A Single Man, he manages to lace his woundedness with an emotionally raw quality that makes it appear unaffected and not actorly. As such, he is the perfect actor to play Eric, and he does it well. But…

Is it wrong for me to say that the film is actually less inspiring than a two minute summary of it would be? That I wished the film had started exactly where it ended, or better yet condensed itself into a ten minute, before the credits preface to the story that was told in its postscript? Yet despite the fact that the film takes the most exceptional part of the story and treats it like an afterthought, I am glad that Eric’s story was made known. He must have been an extraordinary man.

Previous Post

April 22, 2014

White Lies (Rotberg, 2013)

Next Post

April 26, 2014 Film Fest DC -- 2014

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 10 Years Later 1999 Top 5 2007 Top 10 2008 Favorite Discoveries 2008 Top 10 2009 Favorite Discoveries 2009 Top 10 2010 Favorite Discoveries 2010 Top 10 2011 Top 10 2012 Top Ten 2013 Top Ten 2014 Top Ten Best Picture Winners Christian Spotlight on Entertainment Christianity Today Coming Soon Disclosure Disclosure--AS Disclosure--Book Disclosure--DVDS Disclosure--SEOL Disclosure--Travel Dissenting Opinion Elsewhere Emergenetics Essays Featured Film Fest DC--2014 Film Festivals Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2010 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2011 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2012 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2013 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2014 Headline Interviews Laura on the Oscar Winners Podcasts Quick Impressions Reviews RiverRun Film Festival 2014 Television The Criterion Collection The Thin Place To Stream or Not to Stream? Top 10s and Other Lists Toronto International Film Festival 2009 Toronto International Film Festival 2010 Toronto International Film Festival 2011 Toronto International Film Festival 2012 Toronto International Film Festival 2013 Toronto International Film Festival 2014 Uncategorized Video Virginia Film Festival 2011 Virginia Film Festival 2013 Women's Film Festival 2012

Select a Month February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What character trait is praised in the Parable of the Good Samaritan?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Deceit Compassion Selfishness Pride