The Man From U.N.C.L.E. (Ritchie, 2015)

Last updated on: August 13, 2015 at 8:29 pm by Kenneth R. Morefield

The Man From U.N.C.L.E. (Ritchie, 2015) 2015-08-13T20:29:34-05:00 Kenneth R. Morefield

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The Man From U.N.C.L.E. was, for me, the epitome of a 3 star movie: it did what it did pretty well, but what it did was not earth-shattering. Some imperfections keep it from getting that extra “1/2” but a 3 star movie is worth seeing. As a youngin’, I am not familiar with the show the movie is based on, but if the spirit of the show was to be a fun romp with good strong characters, then this film certainly succeeds in carrying that torch. It’s a solid action flick that had a few quirks thanks to the director, Guy Ritchie.

Now, there are Guy Ritchie movies and there are Guy Ritchie movies. He’s got such a strong style, especially in his early films (Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels, Snatch), but he toned it down significantly for the Sherlock Holmes films. In U.N.C.L.E, however, Ritchie seems to let himself go just a little and allow some of his nuances to sneak in. For example, there was one scene where we are introduced to a character by his legendary title, then shown through a narrated montage all the things he has done to earn this title.

For Ritchie fans, that bit should sound familiar, and for Ritchie critics, that bit should sound wearying. There are a few more Ritchie-isms (a sequence of multiple characters arriving at the same place but each receiving their own action narrative), but the film remains second-tier Ritchie.

While it may not have all the “isms” that Ritchie is known for, U.N.C.L.E does have a specific aesthetic. The colors of clothing pop, style is cohesively 60s and the whole film has a well-balanced graininess. I do have to knock the CG: it was bad. Like, 1999 wants their effects team back. The full CG sequences were cringy, but there were only a few of them. The rest of the stunts looked and felt good, which is why the full CG sequences stood out. I’ve heard it said that the reason we think CG is ruining movies is because we only notice bad CG and the good stuff flies under the radar. Well. I noticed it. It contrasted with the rest of the film.

Story wise, the film begins predictably enough: CIA agent Napoleon Solo is tasked with helping a young woman Gaby (Alicia Vikander) across the Berlin wall to find her ex-Nazi father to prevent him from aiding a terrorist group. Forced to partner together, the KGB’s finest IIlya Kuryakin (Armie Hammer), Solo and Gaby must race to stop the construction of a nuclear bomb. Stereotypical but entertaining twists abound and we are left with a set up for a sequel.

Time and time again, what draws me into a movie and what I can really talk about, is the performances of the actors. I appreciate the elements of cinematography, script-writing and directing, but it’s the job of the actors to convince me that the story onscreen is something worth seeing. In this flick, the performances ranged from distracting to exceptional.

On one end, we have Alicia Vikander who plays East Berlin mechanic Gaby. Her character portrayal was spot-on, a wonderful blend of attitude and silliness and she was able to walk the line of being sensitive and confident, but…to say her accent was inconsistent would be a nicety. It started out strong, then faded to almost non-existent, then came back in full force, then dropped back out to obscurity. If they had written in somewhere that she was raised by American parents or given the character any excuse to have a sassy American voice I would have gladly accepted it, but as it stands, her accent was a huge distraction from an otherwise very solid performance.

On the other end of the acting spectrum, we have Armie Hammer as the KGB agen IIIya Kuryakin. Hammer is mostly associated with The Lone Ranger, but he seems to have completely brushed off that train-wreck (Get it? Cause in that movie there was a train? And it wrecked? And also the movie wasn’t great?). Hammer flawlessly executed his thick Russian accent and maintained a certain dignity with his speech that could’ve been thrown out the window in favor of cheap humor. Hammer’s performance made me realize that he is capable of a great range, and this film allowed him to explore it. He sold the action, timed the comedy well and his character’s internal motivations were wordlessly but clearly presented. All around exceptional performance.

Right in the middle of the performance pendulum, we have Henry Cavill whom I previously thought was born to play Superman, but I was wrong. This was the part he was born to play: Napoleon solo, CIA agent with the swagger of 10 James Bonds. In a way, this is the Bond film Cavill never got to make. He was in the running for Bond in Casino Royale when the studio decided to go with Daniel Craig. Had Cavill gotten the part, we would’ve seen a Connery successor and now we see it here. Cavill did a fine job with a small-ranged part. His character was not deeply written, but fleshed out enough for him to have some fun quipping. Solo is essentially a comedic, American James Bond.

As I said before, the flick is a 3 star movie, well done and satisfyingly predictable, no boat-rocking or revolutionary storytelling, just good solid comedy-action fun. Hammer and Cavill have good comedic chemistry, Ritchie is great at directing chase-sequences, so what is the difference between 3 and 3 1/2 stars? Well dear reader who clearly cares about my opinion, to me the difference is whether something is a movie that I stream on Netflix for a nice popcorn night or one that I text my friends about and tell them to go see in theaters.

Disclosure--AS

Reviews

Guy Ritchie

The Man from U.N.C.L.E.

Previous Post

August 10, 2015

The Churchmen -- Season 1, Episode 3 Recap

Next Post

August 20, 2015 Top Spin (Newens & Son, 2014)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 10 Years Later 1999 Top 5 2007 Top 10 2008 Favorite Discoveries 2008 Top 10 2009 Favorite Discoveries 2009 Top 10 2010 Favorite Discoveries 2010 Top 10 2011 Top 10 2012 Top Ten 2013 Top Ten 2014 Top Ten Best Picture Winners Christian Spotlight on Entertainment Christianity Today Coming Soon Disclosure Disclosure--AS Disclosure--Book Disclosure--DVDS Disclosure--SEOL Disclosure--Travel Dissenting Opinion Elsewhere Emergenetics Essays Featured Film Fest DC--2014 Film Festivals Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2010 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2011 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2012 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2013 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2014 Headline Interviews Laura on the Oscar Winners Podcasts Quick Impressions Reviews RiverRun Film Festival 2014 Television The Criterion Collection The Thin Place To Stream or Not to Stream? Top 10s and Other Lists Toronto International Film Festival 2009 Toronto International Film Festival 2010 Toronto International Film Festival 2011 Toronto International Film Festival 2012 Toronto International Film Festival 2013 Toronto International Film Festival 2014 Uncategorized Video Virginia Film Festival 2011 Virginia Film Festival 2013 Women's Film Festival 2012

Select a Month February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who predicted Persia's rise?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Isaiah Ezekiel Daniel Jeremiah