The Criterion Collection: All That Heaven Allows

Last updated on: July 31, 2015 at 8:06 pm by Guest Contributor

The Criterion Collection: All That Heaven Allows 2015-07-31T20:06:54-05:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Ken’s Note: As most cinephiles could tell you, July is one of the month that The Criterion Collection offers its semi-annual 50% off sale. Given the label’s array of titles, taking advantage of that sale can be daunting. I’ve asked friends and colleagues to make write up one of their favorite or newly acquired Criterion discs. In this column, Colin Stacy weighs in on Douglas Sirk’s All That Heaven Allows*.*

It’s hard to imagine a film more befitting of the careful touch of the Criterion Collection’s preservationists than Douglas Sirk’s Technicolor-blasted tale of forbidden love in the American suburbs, All That Heaven Allows (1955). A classic Hollywood melodrama, this film deals in the emotional currency of bold coloring, sumptuous lighting, and emphatic orchestral arrangements. Sirk pushes the boundaries of cinematic artifice by turning the theater (or living room) into a pulsing organ. Its pastels are meant to burst. Its light should glare while its shadows consume. The score is set to erupt often, with timely, flamboyant sentiment. As a document of the domestic time bomb that was America in the 50s, All That Heaven Allows’ visual syntax is perfectly unified. Sirk and cinematographer Russell Metty glean the emotional truth from every layer of the filmmaking process to create not only a reflective portrait of a now bygone time but an adroit text of unprecedented purity, an ode to craft.

Throughout the many interviews included on this teeming Criterion set, Douglas Sirk regularly uses the word “handwriting” to convey his vision of filmmaking. In an excerpt from the BBC documentary Behind the Mirror: A Profile of Douglas Sirk, he mentions how poor of a story All That Heaven Allows was. It was nothing, he says, yet he was allowed the freedom to put a lot of his own “handwriting” into it. He expounds his philosophy even further on the French television program Cinéma cinémas saying that a film’s language is not found in the story but in the light[ing] and the touch. The handwriting is what counts. And as far as modern filmmaking goes, there aren’t many who have better utilized the medium like Sirk. Sure, there are those who can gab incessantly with the form, but Sirk’s language — romanticized and brash — avoids cinematic hyperbole. His “handwriting” is among the most precisely effective the medium has seen.

In All That Heaven Allows, Sirk and Metty’s detailing of the Northeastern suburban life of widowed Cary (an elegant and dignified Jane Wyman) is hyper-meticulous. Her house is possessed by the paraphernalia of the bourgeois, from the wet bar where her son crafts devastatingly inane martinis to the marbled mantlepiece where her late husband’s golfing trophy sits ensconced like a patriarchal throne. She rarely goes out to country club soirees with her housewife-bestie Sara. And as a widow of a certain age, she’s pursued — at snail’s pace — by a family friend, a romance that feels born of the obligatory desperation of a lonely gentleman looking at 70. Cary is entrapped by the mise-en-scene of residential malaise.

Enter Rock Hudson’s town gardener, Ron Kirby. He’s young, hulking, and quiet. He’s been tending her yard for years, but she’s only noticing him now. Since her husband’s dead and all. What starts as a simple coffee-fueled conversation during a work day soon turns to love. Kirby, the tree-loving, stalwart trunk of a man whose sole religious tome is Thoreau’s On Walden Pond, pursues Cary like this good soapy suburban tale calls for. It’s the story of the widow and the gardener, the suburbanite bird and her evergreen tree. But soon the town is at the doorstep, ready to stand scandalized by the forbidden love.

While the story makes for great entertainment (though not as delicious as the pulpy psycho-violence of his next film Written On The Wind), the handwriting yields much more depth than typical soap fair. Sirk wanted to fill the cheap stuff with meaning, as he says in the BBC doc. He does so by literalizing the emotion of his characters while allowing what he was saying to play out more subtly. The desires of his characters are transmuted onto their clothing, the walls of their homes, and in the lighting shining upon them. But his camera moves in a more investigative way, at once observing these lives with simple neighborly fascination yet diving beneath the surface by pressing into the emotional cracks. As the sets, lighting, costumes, and objects tell the emotional tale, Sirk finds the meaning in the frames.

He thought of mirrors as a medium of getting to know oneself, which is why his films are filled with them. The mirrors and other frames in All That Heaven Allows allow us to peek into the interiors of his characters’ lives, most significantly Cary’s. One scene begins with the shot of a tree branch given to her by Ron. The camera slowly tracks backward to show it in a vase upon her vanity where she studies herself in the mirror. Instead of moving on as Cary’s attention is diverted, the camera stays fixed on the mirror as we see her children walking into the room to greet her. The life she desires sits upon the table in a vase while the one she is trapped in remains framed by an unmoving mirror. Later, it’s her reflection in a television screen which will epitomize her imprisonment, revealing that hers is an encaged life not just being viewed by the audience but by the entire town which holds her hostage in judgment.

Maybe more resonant than its commentary on suburbia (which has been as effectively skewered since, in movies ranging from Blue Velvet to Gone Girl) is its studied vision of American womanhood. All That Heaven Allows’ theme of the societally defined worth of a woman feels as prescient as ever. Sirk’s subversion of the female’s assumed American domesticity is careful and loving. He’s a director who not only understood human emotion but also the feminine struggle of this time. He saw a woman’s worth and meaning more than defined by the man whose life hers sat adjacent to. In the suburban milieu, Cary is either widowed or scandalized; she is either the mother of two bratty, capricious children or she is the poor soul alone at the cocktail party. She’s allowed no agency in society, which is why her desperation for freedom finds hope of absolution in her relationship with Kirby, a man who represents the life loosed from society. Sirk gives her agency by telling her story, yet he also keeps the intrinsic social perception constricting.

Criterion clearly loves the art of criticism equally as much as the medium. Without their inclusion of one of the finest audio commentaries I’ve ever heard by film scholars John Mercer and Tamar Jeffers-McDonald and essays (in booklet) by critic Laura Mulvey and the German filmmaker Rainer Werner Fassbinder, who took up Sirk’s mantle, I’d have not known how to navigate the depths of the Sirkian melodrama. The final embrace of two lovers was enough to categorize me into the studio’s target audience, yet the criticism included insightfully reveals the falseness of the “happy ending.” Maybe Cary is freed in the end by her relationship with Ron, yet the penultimate shot has her still trapped within a man’s house. At that final moment, she peers out of the biggest frame of the entire film. Like a lipsticked message on a mirror, Sirk’s handwriting precisely reveals the tension of life’s bold emotions and the image which lies beneath.

—

Colin Stacy lives with his wife Heather and son Everett in Dallas, TX where he works for local medical waste company RedAway. His writing can be found at Reel Spirituality and Movie Mezzanine.

Reviews

All That Heaven Allows

Douglas Sirk

The Criterion Collection

Previous Post

July 25, 2015

The Criterion Collection: Cartesius

Next Post

July 31, 2015 The Criterion Collection: The Game

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 10 Years Later 1999 Top 5 2007 Top 10 2008 Favorite Discoveries 2008 Top 10 2009 Favorite Discoveries 2009 Top 10 2010 Favorite Discoveries 2010 Top 10 2011 Top 10 2012 Top Ten 2013 Top Ten 2014 Top Ten Best Picture Winners Christian Spotlight on Entertainment Christianity Today Coming Soon Disclosure Disclosure--AS Disclosure--Book Disclosure--DVDS Disclosure--SEOL Disclosure--Travel Dissenting Opinion Elsewhere Emergenetics Essays Featured Film Fest DC--2014 Film Festivals Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2010 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2011 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2012 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2013 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2014 Headline Interviews Laura on the Oscar Winners Podcasts Quick Impressions Reviews RiverRun Film Festival 2014 Television The Criterion Collection The Thin Place To Stream or Not to Stream? Top 10s and Other Lists Toronto International Film Festival 2009 Toronto International Film Festival 2010 Toronto International Film Festival 2011 Toronto International Film Festival 2012 Toronto International Film Festival 2013 Toronto International Film Festival 2014 Uncategorized Video Virginia Film Festival 2011 Virginia Film Festival 2013 Women's Film Festival 2012

Select a Month February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What Christian group is known for wearing black hats and beards?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Mennonites Orthodox Jews Quakers Amish