The Bible

Last updated on: April 6, 2015 at 6:43 pm by Matt Page

The Bible 2015-04-06T18:43:02-05:00 Matt Page

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

It may not be exceptional, but it is certainly telling that the most ambitious recent attempt to bring the Bible to our screens starts with two essentially pre-emptive and defensive statements: “This program is an adaptation of Bible Stories that changed our world” suggests a rebuttal to those who question why such a program even justifies a place on our screens, whilst “It endeavors to stay true to the spirit of the book” seems like a defense against potential criticisms that it dares to meander from the original text.

Such sentences not only reveal a great deal about the opposing and entrenched views about the Bible’s place in American culture, but also suggest what is important to the filmmakers. It’s clear, for example, that this is an adaptation eschewing the extremes in an attempt to appeal to the mass audience occupying the middle ground. In this respect, airing on The History Channel lends it at least some small degree of intellectual credibility whilst being up front about the need for artistic licence also signals a desire for a mainstream audience. Such an approach demands high production values, which the program delivers, broadly speaking, banishing memories of bad Bible films of yesteryear with their cheap sets, bad hair and pale imitations of acting.

That line about staying “true to the spirit of the book” is also rather revealing when you consider that the Bible is actually a collection of many, very different, books. The “spirit” of Ecclesiastes, say, is not necessarily the same as the spirit of Acts, Leviticus or Revelation. It’s significant, then that the production’s visual style is remarkably coherent. Throughout the series the same grimy filters are used on the cameras, and the same grungy-with-perfect-teeth approach is taken with costume design. Scene length is almost always about 2-3 minutes. Shot length is typically fairly short, the camera work is often dramatic and showy and Hans Zimmer’s key soundtrack motif pounds away time and time again. That’s not necessarily a criticism of those elements, indeed some of them feature among the production’s strengths, but it does highlight the decision the filmmakers have made to present these stories as all part of the same, over-arching, narrative.

The narrative, of course, climaxes with the story of Jesus, who features in five of the series’ ten episodes. Even figuring the show’s true running time as 6 hours and 40 minutes, that’s a lot camera time. Yet perhaps the film’s biggest weakness is that it doesn’t really have anything to say about Jesus. A whole episode passes before his ministry starts – roughly the same length of time that is spent covering his ministry. Jesus performs a few miracles, utters the odd wise saying and is nice to the marginalized and disempowered, but both his life and his death seem oddly stripped of any real meaning. Ultimately, it’s unclear why his story is the conclusion to all those that have gone before.

It’s a problem that crops up repeatedly due to the program’s tendency to squander its extended running time. Time and time again elements that are, at best, only incidental are overblown or overemphasized. The opening episode deftly covers the stories of the creation, fall, flood and the patriarchs with tremendous efficiency, but devotes a considerable chunk of those 40 minutes to kung-fu angels slow-motion-hacking their way past the inhabitants of Sodom. Similarly the final episode treats us to a long scene of the pre-conversion Saul smashing up houses and torturing one particular Christian to gain information, but finds no time for the Council of Jerusalem or to adequately flesh out Paul’s decades on the road.

Eventually it becomes hugely frustrating to watch the show work so hard at prudently condensing page after page of scripture only to go and waste the extra time by hammering home the point that, yes, Jesus might have been touchy-feely. It’s like watching someone on the breadline carefully manage their food budget with the utmost discipline, only to go and blow the lot on a pot of chocolate flavored caviar. Is it the wastefulness that’s so frustrating or the poor taste? Not unrelated is the script’s tendency to slip into cliché and clunky dialogue. Having witnessed many scenes portrayed with originality and creatively, it’s the unevenness that’s so maddening.

Ultimately, then, whilst The Bible seems to succeed at achieving it’s middle-of-the-road objectives, it seems destined to live on only as stock footage for sermon illustrations. The production values are generally good, Zimmer’s soundtrack is suitably stirring and the effects are occasionally impressive, but the absence of good writing, and a coherent narrative to match the (overly) coherent visuals. mean that The Bible is more likely to be just appreciated rather than truly loved.

—

Matt Page has been writing about the Bible and film for over a decade and runs the Bible Films Blog.

Previous Post

November 27, 2013

Frozen (Buck and Lee, 2013)

Next Post

December 5, 2013 Approaching Midnight (Khaleghi, 2013)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 10 Years Later 1999 Top 5 2007 Top 10 2008 Favorite Discoveries 2008 Top 10 2009 Favorite Discoveries 2009 Top 10 2010 Favorite Discoveries 2010 Top 10 2011 Top 10 2012 Top Ten 2013 Top Ten 2014 Top Ten Best Picture Winners Christian Spotlight on Entertainment Christianity Today Coming Soon Disclosure Disclosure--AS Disclosure--Book Disclosure--DVDS Disclosure--SEOL Disclosure--Travel Dissenting Opinion Elsewhere Emergenetics Essays Featured Film Fest DC--2014 Film Festivals Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2010 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2011 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2012 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2013 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2014 Headline Interviews Laura on the Oscar Winners Podcasts Quick Impressions Reviews RiverRun Film Festival 2014 Television The Criterion Collection The Thin Place To Stream or Not to Stream? Top 10s and Other Lists Toronto International Film Festival 2009 Toronto International Film Festival 2010 Toronto International Film Festival 2011 Toronto International Film Festival 2012 Toronto International Film Festival 2013 Toronto International Film Festival 2014 Uncategorized Video Virginia Film Festival 2011 Virginia Film Festival 2013 Women's Film Festival 2012

Select a Month February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does Paul say in 1 Thessalonians about the day of the Lord?

Select your answer to see how you score.

It will come after the tribulation It will come with great signs It will come like a thief in the night It will come when peace is declared