Strange Rumblings in Shangri La (Guglielmino, 2014)

Last updated on: November 15, 2014 at 2:30 pm by Guest Contributor

Strange Rumblings in Shangri La (Guglielmino, 2014) 2014-11-15T14:30:36-05:00 Guest Contributor

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

The surfing movie has been a staple film genre since the late 1950s when swarms of kids invaded the California coastline, surfboards in tow. Hollywood went crazy, with films such as Gidget and Surf Crazy documenting this enthusiasm. By the late 1980s, the genre had died down, and currently there are few big name surfing movies. Not ones that end up in the theaters, anyway. So the independent film Strange Rumblings in Shangri-La is a welcome treat.

The film, shot on 16mm, has a coloring that surpasses anything I have had the pleasure of watching in the last several months. In addition to the storytelling or the framing, the pure, saturated colors were a treat for the eye. The contrast between land and water, with the lone figure of the surfer, combine to make an excellent dynamic. The colors are pure and undiluted, making the film a visual masterpiece. Every drop of water can be observed. Even besides the water visuals, the other scenes were a treat: scenes of village life, children running ahead of the vans, the surfers walking through rocky terrain to reach the ocean. They all popped and seemed to glow, even more so than in the most realistic films. These colors were so bright they almost seemed impossible or fictitious.

The film follows a group of surfers and the people they find throughout their journey; on their expedition to find paradise, the titled Shangri-La. The group travels by boat, plane, and cart pulled by elephant, through villages the world over, searching through the world’s most beautiful and picturesque surfing locations. The film has no real conflict and there is essentially no plot; it seems to merely float along as effortlessly as the waves on which it focuses. The plot in a sense is to provide the viewer with interesting cinematography and locals, not to draw attention to a problem or provide any kind of solution to this problem.

As a whole, the film stands on its own well, but one wonders how engaging it would be if it lasted any longer than its 51 minute runtime. There is only so long that the average person, not a surfer, not someone with technical expertise on this subject, will be interested in watching repetitive surfing shots. The real draw for a non-surfer lies in the human shots, in the bits of humor that punctuate the film, in the shots of the villages with children running and playing in front of the wagon. For a person unfamiliar with the surfing documentary, this may have just enough human interest to keep them watching, especially with such a short run time.

The film director, Joe Guglielmino, credits Bruce Brown and Jacques Cousteau for influencing the film, saying he attempted to create a work in the spirit of both of these classic surf directors. Brown was cited as one of the first pioneers of the surf film genre, and Cousteau carries with him a legacy of both naval exploration and aquatic photography. Cousteau, a French naval officer turned ocean explorer is often credited as one of the first true aquatic pioneers, interested in underwater research for its own sake, aside from tactical maneuvers.

Likewise, the film seems to take a pure joy in its subject matter. It is clearly a labor of love for the creators, documenting their journey. The film is divided into segments, with each introduced by a narrator providing a brief commentary. Besides that, however, the film’s dialogue has a minimalist feel, with only the essential information being provided. Everything else is left up to the interpretation of the viewer. In this sense, it feels like the creators have chosen this viewpoint so that the dialogue or voiceover will not distract from the cinematography. The focus is not on the interactions between the people in the film; they are only props to get from destination to destination, not well explored characters of their own.

Strange Rumblings in Shangri-La was enjoyable to watch. Perhaps more time could have been spent on the motivations and goals of the main protagonists and the narrator, thus humanizing what are essentially props leading the viewer from location to location. But otherwise it was visually stunning, and I anticipate more well produced works in this genre from these creators.

—

Rachel Davis is a student and freelance journalist.

Strange Rumblings in Shangri La

Previous Post

November 12, 2014

DamNation (Knight and Rummel, 2014)

Next Post

November 16, 2014 Design is One (Brew and Guerra, 2012)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 10 Years Later 1999 Top 5 2007 Top 10 2008 Favorite Discoveries 2008 Top 10 2009 Favorite Discoveries 2009 Top 10 2010 Favorite Discoveries 2010 Top 10 2011 Top 10 2012 Top Ten 2013 Top Ten 2014 Top Ten Best Picture Winners Christian Spotlight on Entertainment Christianity Today Coming Soon Disclosure Disclosure--AS Disclosure--Book Disclosure--DVDS Disclosure--SEOL Disclosure--Travel Dissenting Opinion Elsewhere Emergenetics Essays Featured Film Fest DC--2014 Film Festivals Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2010 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2011 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2012 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2013 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2014 Headline Interviews Laura on the Oscar Winners Podcasts Quick Impressions Reviews RiverRun Film Festival 2014 Television The Criterion Collection The Thin Place To Stream or Not to Stream? Top 10s and Other Lists Toronto International Film Festival 2009 Toronto International Film Festival 2010 Toronto International Film Festival 2011 Toronto International Film Festival 2012 Toronto International Film Festival 2013 Toronto International Film Festival 2014 Uncategorized Video Virginia Film Festival 2011 Virginia Film Festival 2013 Women's Film Festival 2012

Select a Month February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

True or False: Paul instructed Titus that the grace of God teaches us to say 'No' to ungodliness and worldly passions.

Select your answer to see how you score.

TRUE FALSE