Gotham Episode 1.5 Recap: Viper

Last updated on: October 21, 2014 at 11:37 pm by Kenneth R. Morefield

Gotham Episode 1.5 Recap: Viper 2014-10-21T23:37:33-05:00 Kenneth R. Morefield

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Viper was not exactly a turn around for Gotham; I am still very much on the fence about the show overall. I am still very much waiting for the story arc or the villain of the week that gets me excited. But at least some of the features I don’t like in the show were toned down.

First the visuals. I confess I’m lost. An early scene where a junkie musician enters a convenience store (pictured above) is shot through what looks like a green filter. There are little color pops in each scene. The bananas –or the “Special” sign–create a splash of yellow that keeps things from looking too color coordinated, but rather than creating contrast these complementary colors end up distracting. Or maybe it is just that the average scenes are so visually uninteresting that these color pops pull your eyes to them because they are restless looking for something striking. How can the sets simultaneously look so expensive and so very, very dull?

In Fish Mooney’s club, the dominant color is red. In the Penguin’s restaurant there is a strange lack of deep focus that makes you only able to look at the foregrounded characters. (Take a look over Gordon’s shoulder towards the kitchen in the scene where he is being interrogated by the mafioso.) Wayne Manor has a yellow hue that makes it look hazy–except for the blue notebook that Bruce asks Alfred to hand him.

Moving on, I am also struggling to get to know these characters on their own terms. Oh, I know most of them as iterations of established types, but even when watching a character I’ve scene dozens of times before (like say when I watch a new production of King Lear or Hamlet) I want to see how the performer interprets the character. This means making some choices, not just creating a pastiche of previous portraits. Is Bullock corrupt or just lazy? I don’t know. In one scene he chastises Gordon for interrupting lunch to pursue a crime; in the next, he criticizes his partner for taking “personal” time why they are trying to work a case. Young Bruce is smart enough to make connections the police are missing, and he uses his advantage to…tell the people he is investigating that he is investigating them?

Speaking of the murdered Waynes, is there a hint of suspicion in Bruce that his parents might have been corrupt? Or just blind? Would hat not cause him to have some suspicions about Alfred? I’ve always found Alfred to be one of the great untapped characters in the Batman universe, and I would have to assume the enormous amount of trust the adult Bruce places in his family servant was nurtured and not just natural. The second Alfred-Bruce scene was probably the episode’s best because it didn’t feel the need to have Alfred repeat his objections as a shorthand to expositing what the action meant for the audience. (Compare that with, say, Fish’s bedroom exposition to her boy-toy. I get that monologuing is a convention of the comic book genre, but must every character describe what they are doing while they are doing it?) Oh, and “my mother used to sing that [aria] to me every night?” Really? Who sings arias as a lullaby? Like we wouldn’t have understood there was a personal connection driving Falcone’s pick up without that line?

And yet I did like Bruce’s revealing, “I don’t want revenge; I want to understand how it all works.” I think Bruce is too young, and it would be too idealistic, to have him eschew any vengeful motives unless he had something to replace them with. Here that something is curiosity. When we are hurting, nothing beats a distraction. And yet, paradoxically, there is a hint of intellectualization about the whole endeavor. No matter how many years he devotes, there will be some things he never understands. The elder Bruce could, perhaps, suppress vengeance, but to do so habitually requires the building of, well, habits. I’ve always thought of Batman as being more of an Analytical rather than Structural thinker. Young Bruce’s desire to understand “how it all works” was the first time I’ve seen the child as the father of the man. Pattern recognition is such an important component of the Anaytical thinker, and it is nice to see Bruce not only recognize patterns (the whole city is corrupt) but also question how the parts of the pattern interact (what was Wayne’s role in it?).

Overall, Gotham (both the city and the show) is still a little too static. Patterns are okay, but there needs to be variations within them. I liked, for instance, that Gordon teased out the clues (such as they were) and was able to capture the bad guy without being saved by Bullock (again). The police force can be corrupt, but it needs to function. There needs to be some minimal functioning, even in Gotham, to avoid anarchy. To that end, it was encouraging that we did feel the need to advance the Barbara story line. The show signaled that we don’t have to touch every base every show.

Does the show need fixing? Or is it good enough? Was Venom a step forward, a step back, or just another step in place?

Reviews

Television

Gotham

Previous Post

October 19, 2014

Starring Adam West (Tooley, 2013)

Next Post

October 24, 2014 1,000 Times Good Night (Poppe, 2013)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 10 Years Later 1999 Top 5 2007 Top 10 2008 Favorite Discoveries 2008 Top 10 2009 Favorite Discoveries 2009 Top 10 2010 Favorite Discoveries 2010 Top 10 2011 Top 10 2012 Top Ten 2013 Top Ten 2014 Top Ten Best Picture Winners Christian Spotlight on Entertainment Christianity Today Coming Soon Disclosure Disclosure--AS Disclosure--Book Disclosure--DVDS Disclosure--SEOL Disclosure--Travel Dissenting Opinion Elsewhere Emergenetics Essays Featured Film Fest DC--2014 Film Festivals Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2010 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2011 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2012 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2013 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2014 Headline Interviews Laura on the Oscar Winners Podcasts Quick Impressions Reviews RiverRun Film Festival 2014 Television The Criterion Collection The Thin Place To Stream or Not to Stream? Top 10s and Other Lists Toronto International Film Festival 2009 Toronto International Film Festival 2010 Toronto International Film Festival 2011 Toronto International Film Festival 2012 Toronto International Film Festival 2013 Toronto International Film Festival 2014 Uncategorized Video Virginia Film Festival 2011 Virginia Film Festival 2013 Women's Film Festival 2012

Select a Month February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "Beersheba" mean?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Valley of Water House of the King Well of the Oath Blessed Field