Gemma Bovery (Fontaine, 2014)

Last updated on: September 1, 2015 at 2:23 pm by Kenneth R. Morefield

Gemma Bovery (Fontaine, 2014) 2015-09-01T14:23:07-05:00 Kenneth R. Morefield

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Anne Fontaine’s Gemma Bovery is one of those films I see at The Toronto Film Festival, enjoy, and then somehow never hear from again until it pops up, unannounced on Redbox or streaming on Amazon.

Sometimes it is easy to figure out why such films don’t find an audience–too small, too indie, too foreign–but at other times the vagaries of film distribution are maddeningly opaque. So when Music Box Films announced a DVD release, I welcomed the opportunity to revisit the film and see whether or not my initial affinity was overstated.

The answer: maybe a little. Gemma Bovery (★★★) is a fine film. In retrospect I find it all the more interesting for avoiding a too-close parallel to its literary namesake. And yet…after an exquisite first twenty-five minutes or so, I did find my attention lagging a bit. And while I appreciated the film’s refusal to turn Gemma’s infidelities into some sort of feminist diatribe against her husband or the system, its inability to convey much of anything about the titular character’s interior world keeps us largely at arm’s length.

I have heard a few complaints that the film is too male-gazish given that it has female star, a female director, a female screenwriter, and is adapted from a female’s graphic novel. Yes, Posy Simmonds is doing a riff on Flaubert’s masterpiece, but the relationship between Gemma and Emma is more tenuous than even that between Tamara Drewe and Bathsheba Everdene. This really is Simmonds story more than it is a modernization of Flaubert’s, and while Fontaine certainly knows how to shoot Arteron in such a way as to draw attention to where Joubert’s gaze is landing, her purpose in doing so is to tell us something about Joubert rather than to simply revel in Gemma Arterton’s beauty.

Therein, perhaps, lies part of the film’s problem. Title, aside, this is really a movie about Joubert, not about Gemma. Joubert (Fabrice Luchini) is a baker who is intrigued by the English couple who move in to a run down house next to his residence and shop. That her name is Gemma and his Charles evokes in him a curiosity about the couple. As he becomes aware that Gemma is conducting an extramarital affair, Joubert begins to worry that perhaps her story will parallel her namesake’s in other, more tragic ways. (One of the film’s running gags is about Joubert protesting Emma should not use rat poison to kill field mice since it has arsenic in it.)

A less ambitious film might drift along, content with simply being clever at referencing the literary plot and making the audience feel clever for recognizing the parallels. But as with Tamara Drewe, Simmonds seems more interested in using the literary parallels as starting points rather than as the end-all-be-all. Both texts have a self-conscious, metafictive quality born from having major characters who are writers or readers. Our relationship to literature, the ways in which literary stories shape our perceptions and preoccupations, is a common theme in both of Simmonds’s works. Here, Joubert even tries to get Gemma to read Flaubert; she recognizes some kinship with the tragic figure but dismisses as silly his fear for her own safety. Do you think I would kill myself over some debts, she asks? “I am not that woman. I ‘m me [….] I’m free.”

Is she? Are any of us? On the surface we might think so,but two structural features make us hesitate. The film is told in flashback, so in a very real sense, Gemma’s fate is determined. Also, the story is set in motion by Joubert reading Gemma’s journal, so we are never sure which scenes are as Gemma described and which are products of the baker’s overactive imagination. Even if Gemma could escape the male gaze, there is no way to escape the male imagination.

Overall, I tend to think ambition a good thing. Ultimately, though, Gemma Bovery feels a bit too ambitious. Perhaps the greater success of Tamara Drewe might stem from the fact that, paradoxically, Far from the Madding Crowd is a lesser (though still good) novel. “How to kill someone else’s affair when it brings you grief?” Joubert ponders. That’s a pretty interesting question, actually, and one wishes the film wrestled a bit more with Joubert’s culpability. Or our own, for that matter. Is Joubert a surrogate author or a surrogate viewer? If the film was going to be about Joubert, it should have gone all the way. Instead it teases us with a number of intriguing but only have baked themes.

Nevertheless two elements elevate the film despite its script problems. Arterton is terrific–when is she not? She plays Gemma so matter-of-factly, in such a non-actorly manner, that we can’t help but look at Gemma as a normal person rather than a literary “heroine.” Finally, Fontaine’s compositions and camerawork are really interesting. In one virtuoso shot near the film’s beginning, the camera follows Joubert as he walks across the lane to speak with his neighbor. Then the camera zooms up and over the wall separating the yard from the street, giving us a bird’s-eye view of the proceedings. There it waits patiently for Joubert, who has taken the long way around the wall to the gate, to re-enter the frame. The visual symbolism is subtle but clever: the camera can go where the characters can’t, and it sometimes takes characters awhile to catch up. This is probably the first film where I’ve been more interested in Fontaine as director than as writer. (Perhaps one of the film’s unresolved tensions stems from the fact that Fontaine usually seems more interested in middle-aged women while Simmonds is more interested in young women? It’s amazing how much mileage Fontaine gets out of Edith Scob in just one or two scenes.) Ultimately, Gemma Bovery makes me more interested in seeing Fontaine’s or Arterton’s next projects (Agnus Dei and A Hundred Streets, respectiviely) than in revisiting this one, but if you didn’t see it on the festival circuit, it is definitely worth checking out on DVD.

Gemma Bovery will be available on DVD from Music Box Films beginning September 1, 2015.

Previous Post

August 25, 2015

Tomorrow We Disappear (Goldblum & Weber, 2014)

Next Post

August 28, 2015 War Room (Kendrick, 2015)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 10 Years Later 1999 Top 5 2007 Top 10 2008 Favorite Discoveries 2008 Top 10 2009 Favorite Discoveries 2009 Top 10 2010 Favorite Discoveries 2010 Top 10 2011 Top 10 2012 Top Ten 2013 Top Ten 2014 Top Ten Best Picture Winners Christian Spotlight on Entertainment Christianity Today Coming Soon Disclosure Disclosure--AS Disclosure--Book Disclosure--DVDS Disclosure--SEOL Disclosure--Travel Dissenting Opinion Elsewhere Emergenetics Essays Featured Film Fest DC--2014 Film Festivals Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2010 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2011 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2012 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2013 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2014 Headline Interviews Laura on the Oscar Winners Podcasts Quick Impressions Reviews RiverRun Film Festival 2014 Television The Criterion Collection The Thin Place To Stream or Not to Stream? Top 10s and Other Lists Toronto International Film Festival 2009 Toronto International Film Festival 2010 Toronto International Film Festival 2011 Toronto International Film Festival 2012 Toronto International Film Festival 2013 Toronto International Film Festival 2014 Uncategorized Video Virginia Film Festival 2011 Virginia Film Festival 2013 Women's Film Festival 2012

Select a Month February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who was known as the doubter among Jesus' disciples?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Peter John James Thomas