Fahrenheit 9/11 (Moore, 2004) — Ten Years Later

Last updated on: May 25, 2015 at 7:39 pm by Kenneth R. Morefield

Fahrenheit 9/11 (Moore, 2004) — Ten Years Later 2015-05-25T19:39:02-05:00 Kenneth R. Morefield

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

★½ (out of 5)

I don’t think I have ever reviewed a Michael Moore film before. That makes the standard format for a 10 Years Later review tricky. One can’t really compare one’s initial impressions with one’s current take if the former was never on the record.

I wasn’t even sure that I had ever watched Fahrenheit 9/11 all the way through. Some bits seemed familiar, such as Moore reading the Patriot Act through an ice cream truck’s loudspeaker. Other parts, like the grieving mother of a soldier killed in action visiting the White House gates, did not prompt any recollection at all.

What Was Said Then

The list of those giving positive reviews was impressive and, I will admit, a little surprising. Fahrenheit 9/11 nabbed “fresh” ratings from David Denby, Stanley Kaufmann, Jonathan Rosenbaum, Owen Gleiberman, Kent Jones, Mark Cousins (at Sight & Sound), Andrew Sarris, Anne Hornaday, Michael Wilmington, and Kenneth Turan, among others. Perhaps more surprising, the film nabbed Moore the Palme d’Or at the 2004 Cannes Film Festival, making it one of only four American films to receive that honor in the last two decades. (The others were Pulp Fiction, Elephant, and Tree of Life.) Michael Moore may have honed his gadfly-outsider persona to sharp perfection, but the truth is he is respected by both the American film industry and the international film community. He may not hold a political position, but he is, as far as the film industry is concerned, part of the establishment.

What I Say Now

I can’t exactly say that the film hasn’t aged well since I don’t recall being that high on it in the first place, but time, as it is wont to do, has certainly provided a broader canvas on which to situate it. On that broader canvas, Fahrenheit 9/11 looks and sounds like it has more in common with Fox News and comedy infotainment (such as The Colbert Show and The Daily Show) than it does with more serious and successful documentaries (such as Why We Fight, Taxi to The Dark Side, or The Fog of War).

My complaints are two, and they are both the more frustrating for obscuring the occasional relevant and important pieces (such as claims that the Bush administration had decided they wanted to “do something” about Iraq prior to the 9/11 attacks). The first is the lack of a consistent and coherent thesis. The second is the consistent privileging of emotional appeals over reasoned argument.

It’s clear that Moore was not a fan of George W. Bush’s administration. (Neither was I.) But his animosity runs so deep that he cannot limit himself to one argument. At various points in the film Moore chastises Bush for taking too much vacation, for redacting the names of another soldier when releasing his own military records, for having supporters in key positions in Florida, and for eroding civil liberties in The Patriot Act. None of these accusations is without some merit (or without people who have made similar arguments better elsewhere) but what some of them had to do with 9/11 and what any of them had to do with each other was pretty obscure.

Even when Moore is on point, though, the level of discourse is rarely worthy of the seriousness of the topic. The film plays the opening of Gunsmoke with faces of the Bush administration pasted over various characters. The Go-Go’s sing “Vacation” over footage of the former president on the golf course. Moore takes time out to mock Britney Spears for saying that she “trusts” this president and suggesting Americans should pull together in time of war. In perhaps the most egregious (and offensive) moment,a contributor describes Osama bin-Laden as “a simple and quiet guy” and Moore asks who else those adjectives describes while inserting a picture of George W. Bush on screen. Really? I can practically hear Dana Carvey asking, “Could it be Satan?” in the background.

The Verdict

Were Fahrenheit 9/11 less lauded–the Palme d’Or?!?!–or more consistently snarky, it might not be to my taste, but it wouldn’t particularly bother me. As it stands, it’s hard for me to entirely squelch the feeling that the playbook Moore develops here would get co-opted and perfected by Fox News and those who want to take pot shots at anyone they disagree with.

Dissent is important in American culture, and questioning our politicians is an act of bravery and patriotism. But when we blur the line between questioning and scoffing, the broader audience may begin to lose the ability to tell the difference, and our opponents may jump at the opportunity to exploit the deterioration of our rhetorical evaluation skills. Whatever side of a political spectrum we are on, I think we suffer for having a more polarized and less restrained form of political discourse. I think that is what we have now, and I think Michael Moore helped get us there.

Previous Post

May 3, 2014

Moms' Night Out (Erwin and Erwin, 2014)

Next Post

May 12, 2014 Bright Days Ahead (Vernoux, 2013)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 10 Years Later 1999 Top 5 2007 Top 10 2008 Favorite Discoveries 2008 Top 10 2009 Favorite Discoveries 2009 Top 10 2010 Favorite Discoveries 2010 Top 10 2011 Top 10 2012 Top Ten 2013 Top Ten 2014 Top Ten Best Picture Winners Christian Spotlight on Entertainment Christianity Today Coming Soon Disclosure Disclosure--AS Disclosure--Book Disclosure--DVDS Disclosure--SEOL Disclosure--Travel Dissenting Opinion Elsewhere Emergenetics Essays Featured Film Fest DC--2014 Film Festivals Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2010 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2011 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2012 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2013 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2014 Headline Interviews Laura on the Oscar Winners Podcasts Quick Impressions Reviews RiverRun Film Festival 2014 Television The Criterion Collection The Thin Place To Stream or Not to Stream? Top 10s and Other Lists Toronto International Film Festival 2009 Toronto International Film Festival 2010 Toronto International Film Festival 2011 Toronto International Film Festival 2012 Toronto International Film Festival 2013 Toronto International Film Festival 2014 Uncategorized Video Virginia Film Festival 2011 Virginia Film Festival 2013 Women's Film Festival 2012

Select a Month February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

Who saw a plumb line in a vision, symbolizing judgment?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Obadiah Joel Amos Micah