Dear Uncle Adolf: The Germans and Their Fuhrer (Kloft, 2010)

Last updated on: February 27, 2015 at 8:04 pm by Kenneth R. Morefield

Dear Uncle Adolf: The Germans and Their Fuhrer (Kloft, 2010) 2015-02-27T20:04:57-05:00 Kenneth R. Morefield

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

What would you write in a letter to Adolf Hitler?

One of the academically interesting consequences of the end of the cold war has been access to historical material that would not necessarily been available to Western historians while the Soviet Union was still in existence. Michael Kloft’s documentary details one such historical resource: a recently discovered archive of over 100,000 letters written by German people to Adolf Hitler between the years 1932 and 1945.

Part of the interest in watching such a documentary, as with most Hitler films, is an admittedly mesmerizing kind of historical hindsight that allows one to simultaneously cringe and chuckle at the woman who wants to have Hitler’s baby and the man who would consider it the honor of his life if he could only be allowed to give Hitler a haircut.

There is a more serious philosophical and historical investigation going on here, however. As we now stand over fifty years past the end of World War II, attempts to understand Hitler the individual get less traction than attempts at “cultural” criticism–attempts to understand the German people and heritage that allowed (welcomed? supported? was victimized by?) Hitler’s rise to power. The documentary wants to be a meaningful contributor to that debate, but its biggest handicap is its source material. With over 100,000 letters to choose from, the archive itself is bound to have letters from those who opposed as well as from those who welcomed the Fuhrer.

he contemporary standard in news media (director Kloft has done several films for PBS’s American Experience) is that one must show examples from both sides, even if, on average those samples are not representative of the whole. Add to the mix the requisite letters from obvious crackpots, and it is hard to get a sense, in sixty minutes, of which letters are more representative of the whole and which are interesting but anomalous remnants of history.

The concerns about take home messages aside, the film is nevertheless engaging throughout and quite fascinating in segments. Several letters are about the party’s treatment of Jews, and there is a sort of jarring, poignant naivete in one letter from a Jew asking Hitler to restore rights to his people because, other than in this one area, he really has admired and supported the leader.

One letter that was quite a find (and which is surprisingly introduced with little fanfare) is from film director Leni Riefenstahl. Riefenstahl told Cahiers du Cinema in 1965:

Triumph of the Will brought me innumerable, very hard troubles after the war. It was, effectively, a film made to order, proposed by Hitler. But that was happening, you must remember, in 1934. And, assuredly, it was impossible for the young girl that I was to foresee what was going to come about. At that period, Hitler had acquired a certain credit in the world for himself, and he fascinated a certain number of people–among them Winston Churchill. And I, I alone, I should have been able to foresee that one day things would change?

At that time, one believed in something beautiful. In construction. In peace [….]

This description of herself by Riefenstahl is hard to square with her letter in Dear Uncle Adolf, which talks of being “thrilled” by the site of the German army marching through the streets of Paris. The juxtaposition of these two sentiments, though, is a reminder of both the value of the written archive and the challenges presented to the historian in assessing his or her material. People (individuals and groups) change over time. As circumstances change, they may try to revise their own personal or corporate histories. Sometimes this process is deliberate, at other times it can be so gradual and unconscious that a person can really convince himself or herself that he believed, thought, or acted differently in the past than what a dispassionate survey of witnesses or archives might suggest.

Ultimately Dear Uncle Adolf won’t provide definitive answers for those who seek to understand the relationship between the man and the larger culture, but it does prompt and invite the right sort of questions.

Previous Post

August 5, 2011

Rise of the Planet of the Apes (Wyatt, 2011)

Next Post

September 11, 2011 A Separation (Farhadi, 2011)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 10 Years Later 1999 Top 5 2007 Top 10 2008 Favorite Discoveries 2008 Top 10 2009 Favorite Discoveries 2009 Top 10 2010 Favorite Discoveries 2010 Top 10 2011 Top 10 2012 Top Ten 2013 Top Ten 2014 Top Ten Best Picture Winners Christian Spotlight on Entertainment Christianity Today Coming Soon Disclosure Disclosure--AS Disclosure--Book Disclosure--DVDS Disclosure--SEOL Disclosure--Travel Dissenting Opinion Elsewhere Emergenetics Essays Featured Film Fest DC--2014 Film Festivals Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2010 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2011 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2012 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2013 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2014 Headline Interviews Laura on the Oscar Winners Podcasts Quick Impressions Reviews RiverRun Film Festival 2014 Television The Criterion Collection The Thin Place To Stream or Not to Stream? Top 10s and Other Lists Toronto International Film Festival 2009 Toronto International Film Festival 2010 Toronto International Film Festival 2011 Toronto International Film Festival 2012 Toronto International Film Festival 2013 Toronto International Film Festival 2014 Uncategorized Video Virginia Film Festival 2011 Virginia Film Festival 2013 Women's Film Festival 2012

Select a Month February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Isaiah see in his vision in Isaiah 6?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A chariot of fire The Lord seated on His throne A ladder to heaven A burning bush