Beginners (Mills, 2010)

Last updated on: February 27, 2015 at 7:56 pm by Katherine Richards

Beginners (Mills, 2010) 2015-02-27T19:56:58-05:00 Katherine Richards

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

Christopher Plummer and Ewan McGregor

I’m sort of picky about films. I’m not a movie snob–well at least I try not to be, and I enjoy a wide spectrum of movies. But, I rarely commit to a movie. I rarely get hooked. I usually recommend films with a caveat about how it’s not great. So, when I say I am over the moon with a film–I mean it. And I’m so over the moon with Mike Mills’ Beginners. As a result I’m left to try and figure out why this movie made the cut and so many others didn’t.

The film focuses on Oliver, played understated and simply by Ewan Mcgregor, and his father Hal, who has recently died of cancer. Hal, played by Christopher Plummer, is also a man who came out of the closet at 75 after his wife, Oliver’s mother, died. So when Hal dies he leaves behind a young boyfriend and several rainbow coalition and gay-pride groups–in addition to Oliver. One thing I love about the film is that this is just part of the story. The film does not focus on the adjustment to Hal’s late coming out; instead, it manifests in Oliver’s understanding of his parents’ marriage and what that means for him and his relationships with people. Hal’s struggle with his sexuality is just part of what the film is really addressing: love, life, death, how we begin and end and what we do in between the two–you know, the little things.

Because the film is quietly philosophical, I couldn’t help comparing it to The Tree of Life, which I just recently saw. Both films focus on childhood and the damage and/or stability it causes, parent-child relationships, the differences between a healthy relationship/marriage and an unhealthy one. The Tree of Life is a magnum opus devoted to contemplating and musing over these issues. It tries very hard to be a masterpiece, to be art. There’s a fundamental flaw in that sort of film or work: a masterpiece is one because it somehow transcends our definition of art, not just because it attempts to meet it. Beginners knows this and subsequently makes no attempt to be great–and yet it is.

The film opens with Oliver silently sorting, throwing away, and keeping his father’s belongings; then he begins to narrate the film, which he will do sporadically throughout. Oliver’s narration is what connects and sorts out the scenes from his past and present, which are shown to the audience simultaneously. This is part of what makes the film work. Rather than doing a linear narrative or a present and flashback narrative, the film shows scenes from Oliver’s past as he remembers them, when he remembers them. Sometimes scenes are repeated or explained more than once. For instance, one of the first “past” scenes we get is of Hal telling Oliver that he is gay and has been his whole life. We see Hal sitting across a table in a purple sweater; then Oliver says, “I always remember dad wearing a purple sweater, but he was actually wearing a robe.” As a result, we then see Hal in a robe saying what he just said while he was in the purple sweater–then we see him in a grey sweater and are essentially shown three versions of a memory. Each of the scenes are very alike but slightly different. The film uses this technique throughout, emphasizing both the power of impression and memory and its illusive nature. Sometimes the conflation of past and present in a film can be confusing for the viewer, and sometimes that is purposeful, but not in this case. We experience Oliver’s past and present as he experiences them, which is articulated not just through his narration but also in his illustrations.

Oliver works as a graphic designer successful because of one particular technique that he cannot seem to shake off due to customer demand. We see many cartoons/illustrations as Oliver draws them and talks about them. He draws one series about the history of sadness, which gives the audience a close look at Oliver’s feelings and mental processes. But his drawings are satirical and paradoxically light-hearted in lieu of their subject matter. It is through his illustrations that we see Oliver try to understand his father’s death, his own life, and his relationships.

However, I can see how this illustration technique could seem distant or just corny in other films. I think it works here partially because of McGregor’s performance. He is aloof and sad while also being caring and endearingly quiet-natured. We also buy the illustrations and how they muse over life because of the glimpses of his relationships that we are given. We see him care for his ailing father, grieve for his death, be his eccentric mother’s (played perfectly by Mary Page Keller) companion as a boy, and have a deep affection for Arthur, his father’s Jack Russell terrier–arguably one of the best characters in the film. The guy we see reading to his father and playing dead with his mother seems like a guy who would work out his issues by drawing satirical cartoons. But Oliver, like all of us the film ultimately claims, is a beginner, and as a beginner he has not quite figured out how to be happy in the time between the beginning and the end. He has had a series of unsuccessful relationships which he eventually says he forced to fail before they would fail on their own. He realizes this, and inevitably tries to change, in his relationship with Anna. The film follows their relationship from its beginning, and it is Oliver’s attempt to let Anna in that prompts many of his memories and aids in his grief of his father. Anna is very much like Oliver’s mother, and in accepting the fact that his relationship does not have to be like his parents’ he finally lets Anna in; he finally truly gives it a go.

Ultimately, this quietly beautiful and introspective film claims that to begin means to look at everything: life, death, and all the shit and glory in between and say, “why not?”

**Katherine Richards is a graduate student at Dusquesne University in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and a contributor to Faith and Spirituality in Masters of World Cinema, Volume 2.**

Previous Post

July 3, 2011

Memento (Nolan, 2001)

Next Post

July 15, 2011 Winnie the Pooh (Anderson and Hall, 2011)

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 10 Years Later 1999 Top 5 2007 Top 10 2008 Favorite Discoveries 2008 Top 10 2009 Favorite Discoveries 2009 Top 10 2010 Favorite Discoveries 2010 Top 10 2011 Top 10 2012 Top Ten 2013 Top Ten 2014 Top Ten Best Picture Winners Christian Spotlight on Entertainment Christianity Today Coming Soon Disclosure Disclosure--AS Disclosure--Book Disclosure--DVDS Disclosure--SEOL Disclosure--Travel Dissenting Opinion Elsewhere Emergenetics Essays Featured Film Fest DC--2014 Film Festivals Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2010 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2011 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2012 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2013 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2014 Headline Interviews Laura on the Oscar Winners Podcasts Quick Impressions Reviews RiverRun Film Festival 2014 Television The Criterion Collection The Thin Place To Stream or Not to Stream? Top 10s and Other Lists Toronto International Film Festival 2009 Toronto International Film Festival 2010 Toronto International Film Festival 2011 Toronto International Film Festival 2012 Toronto International Film Festival 2013 Toronto International Film Festival 2014 Uncategorized Video Virginia Film Festival 2011 Virginia Film Festival 2013 Women's Film Festival 2012

Select a Month February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What did Israel ask Samuel for despite his warnings?

Select your answer to see how you score.

A new Tabernacle A king A prophet A palace