A Royal Affair (Arcel, 2012)

Last updated on: April 4, 2015 at 9:30 pm by Kenneth R. Morefield

A Royal Affair (Arcel, 2012) 2015-04-04T21:30:13-05:00 Kenneth R. Morefield

LOGO Patheos Explore the world's faith through different perspectives on religion and spirituality! Patheos has the views of the prevalent religions and spiritualities of the world.

There is a scene about half way through Nikolaj Arcel’s slightly overlong and slightly overpraised historical romance about the love triangle between Danish king Christian VII (Mikkel Boe Følsgaard), his English queen Caroline Mathilde (Alicia Vikander), and their German doctor Johann Friedrich Stuensee(Mads Mikkelsen), where the doctor tells Christian he could be a great king.

If we view that speech as sincere (which I believe the film’s technically-a-downer-but-morally-a-vindication ending invites us to do), we must conclude that the doctor and his regal mistress are doubly put upon by circumstances. They would be the decent folks that their Enlightenment rhetoric tells them (and us) they are–he a simple but sincere doctor who believes in progress, she a faithful wife in an arranged marriage for the good of all Europe–if only they were not placed in a situation where the ideals forming that rhetoric were impossible to live out.

Her problem is that she thinks Christian really is mad; his is that Christians in Denmark and on the king’s court are hypocrites and mad for power. At this point the film is set up for a standard historical conflict between religious bigots and men of reason. The odd thing about this one, though, is that until the final five minute coda, the film complicates that conflict by showing these forces not as opposites but rather as mirrors of one another.

It’s not just the matter of the adultery, although that is bad enough. In most of his tenure as the king’s adviser, Struensee evidences all the faults he deplores in his opposition: he pressures Christian to sign an edict allowing him to pass laws without the consent of the king, abrogating his role as adviser for a more subtle coup d’etat; he distracts the king by finding him a negro boy to be his plaything despite his professed abhorrence at the medieval system of serfdom and peasant ownership; he manipulates the king into sleeping with his estranged wife so that her as-yet-undetected pregnancy will not be evidence of her affair. The latter is done despite the insinuation that intercourse could be harmful to the wife and fetus. (Is the implication that the king may have some sort of sexually transmitted disease? Even if it is not, the potentiality exists, as a doctor would surely know.)

The difference between a protagonist who is internally conflicted and one who is externally thwarted is one which separates the good film that was from the great film that might have been. Struensee should be a tragic figure shocked and pained by his own compromises–a more sympathetic Michael Corleone if you will.

The film wants to have it both ways, however, with Struensee and Caroline enlightened politically however selfish they are romantically. In fact, their mutual distaste for the religious zealotry and political excesses of the age is what is supposed to unite them. In this, too, the epilogue works against itself. Caroline makes a rational appeal to her son, whom we are told was able to enact the reforms she and Struensee both wanted. Was the reason he was able to succeed simply time? Perhaps, though it does say the heir had help from his father at defeating the court. Perhaps the son was not encumbered by the xenophobia, or perhaps he did not have to balance the concerns of ruling with those of hiding the secrets of the bedroom. Whatever the reason, the father-son alliance ends up belying the film’s central premise that good intentions justify cutting moral corners when the desired outcomes cannot be achieved any other way. It turns out there usually is another way.

For all that, the film is still successful. The visuals are achingly beautiful, and the acting is superb. Nor is A Royal Affair simply a triumph of style over substance. There is a bracing quality to its moral vision, however compromised by its oversimplifications. The themes of surrendering to a self-torturing, illicit passion is rote, but the theme of struggling with a temptation to seize power for the greater good…well, okay, it’s pretty rote, too. But the second theme is drawn to perfection here, allowing A Royal Affair to act as a foil for such films as A Man for All Seasons, Agora, The Godfather, V for Vendetta, Dave, Conspiracy, and Gandhi. Those films are of varying quality, of course, but each in its way is about how temptations that threaten to dethrone our better angels are either withstood or countenanced. When the temptation is withstood and some larger goal is achieved even at the cost of personal sacrifice, we have an inspirational tale. When the temptation is the means through which that higher ideals are thwarted we have a cautionary one.

A Royal Affair is a really stellar example of the latter. I’m just not sure it knows it. In trying to convince us that it is, or could be, the former, it appears to convince only itself.

Johann Friedrich Struensee

Nikolaj Arcel

Previous Post

March 2, 2013

Searching for Sugar Man (Bendjelloul, 2012)

Next Post

March 26, 2013 In America (Sheridan, 2003) -- 10 Years Later

Browse Our Archives

Select a Category 10 Years Later 1999 Top 5 2007 Top 10 2008 Favorite Discoveries 2008 Top 10 2009 Favorite Discoveries 2009 Top 10 2010 Favorite Discoveries 2010 Top 10 2011 Top 10 2012 Top Ten 2013 Top Ten 2014 Top Ten Best Picture Winners Christian Spotlight on Entertainment Christianity Today Coming Soon Disclosure Disclosure--AS Disclosure--Book Disclosure--DVDS Disclosure--SEOL Disclosure--Travel Dissenting Opinion Elsewhere Emergenetics Essays Featured Film Fest DC--2014 Film Festivals Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2010 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2011 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2012 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2013 Full Frame Documentary Film Festival 2014 Headline Interviews Laura on the Oscar Winners Podcasts Quick Impressions Reviews RiverRun Film Festival 2014 Television The Criterion Collection The Thin Place To Stream or Not to Stream? Top 10s and Other Lists Toronto International Film Festival 2009 Toronto International Film Festival 2010 Toronto International Film Festival 2011 Toronto International Film Festival 2012 Toronto International Film Festival 2013 Toronto International Film Festival 2014 Uncategorized Video Virginia Film Festival 2011 Virginia Film Festival 2013 Women's Film Festival 2012

Select a Month February 2016 January 2016 December 2015 November 2015 October 2015 September 2015 August 2015 July 2015 June 2015 May 2015 April 2015 March 2015 February 2015 January 2015 December 2014 November 2014 October 2014 September 2014 August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009

TAKE THE

Religious Wisdom Quiz

What does "apostle" literally mean in Greek?

Select your answer to see how you score.

Leader Friend Sent one Writer